Mosley v. State

141 S.W.2d 331, 139 Tex. Crim. 408, 1940 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 380
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 27, 1940
DocketNo. 20930
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 141 S.W.2d 331 (Mosley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mosley v. State, 141 S.W.2d 331, 139 Tex. Crim. 408, 1940 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 380 (Tex. 1940).

Opinions

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is theft of hogs; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

After the adjournment of court, appellant filed an appeal bond, which was approved by the sheriff. The record does not disclose that the appeal bond was approved by the court trying the case. Article 818, C. C. P., requires that the appeal bond be approved by the sheriff and the court trying the case, or his successor in office. In the absence of a recognizance or appeal bond approved as the law requires, this court is without jurisdiction to pass on the merits of the case. Gonzales v. State, 298 S. W. 893.

The appeal is dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michael Kleinman v. the State of Texas
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2024

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 S.W.2d 331, 139 Tex. Crim. 408, 1940 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mosley-v-state-texcrimapp-1940.