Joseph v. State
204 S.W. 320, 83 Tex. Crim. 522, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 241
Opinions
This is a misdemeanor case in which the recognizance fails to name the offense for which the conviction was had, or state the penalty assessed. The motion to dismiss, filed hy the State, is based upon this defect. This motion, under the decisions of this State, must he sustained. Art. 903, C. C. P.; White v. State, 68 Texas Crim. Rep., 147, 151 S. W. Rep., 826; Watson v. State, 62 Texas Crim. Rep., 620.
The appeal is dismissed. Dismissed.
PRENDERGAST, Judge, absent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Joseph v. State, 204 S.W. 320, 83 Tex. Crim. 522, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 241 (Tex. 1918).
204 S.W. 320 (Joseph v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
White v. State
151 S.W. 826 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1912)
Watson v. State
138 S.W. 611 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1911)