Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Joseph v. State

Joseph v. State

204 S.W. 320, 83 Tex. Crim. 522, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 241
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 10, 1918
DocketNo. 4984.
StatusPublished

This text of 204 S.W. 320 (Joseph v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph v. State, 204 S.W. 320, 83 Tex. Crim. 522, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 241 (Tex. 1918).

Opinions

MORROW, Judge.

This is a misdemeanor case in which the recognizance fails to name the offense for which the conviction was had, or state the penalty assessed. The motion to dismiss, filed hy the State, is based upon this defect. This motion, under the decisions of this State, must he sustained. Art. 903, C. C. P.; White v. State, 68 Texas Crim. Rep., 147, 151 S. W. Rep., 826; Watson v. State, 62 Texas Crim. Rep., 620.

The appeal is dismissed. Dismissed.

PRENDERGAST, Judge, absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White v. State
151 S.W. 826 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1912)
Watson v. State
138 S.W. 611 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 S.W. 320, 83 Tex. Crim. 522, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-v-state-texcrimapp-1918.