White v. State
151 S.W. 826, 68 Tex. Crim. 147, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 569
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 13, 1912·No. No. 2032.·Published·Cited by 11 cases
Opinions
— Appellant was prosecuted, charged with assault with intent to rape, and when tried was convicted of an aggravated assault.
The recognizance entered into is not in compliance with articles 900-3, and the case must be dismissed because of said defects. It does not state the punishment assessed against him, etc.
The appeal is dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White v. State, 151 S.W. 826, 68 Tex. Crim. 147, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 569 (Tex. 1912).
151 S.W. 826 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Newburn v. State
205 So. 2d 260 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1967)
Waldrep v. State
199 S.W.2d 781 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1947)
Duran v. State
197 S.W.2d 356 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1946)
Priest v. State
47 S.W.2d 280 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Graham v. State
46 S.W.2d 709 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Ex Parte Cochrain
243 S.W. 455 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Godby v. State
227 S.W. 192 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Young v. State
222 S.W. 1103 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Goss v. State
202 S.W. 956 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1918)
Joseph v. State
204 S.W. 320 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1918)