Brown v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Brown v. State

247 S.W. 288, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 928

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 24, 1923

DocketNo. 7361

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 247 S.W. 288 (Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. State, 247 S.W. 288, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 928 (Tex. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

HAWKINS, J.

Appellant was convicted of a misdemeanor, from which he appeals. He seeks enlargement pending the same upon a bond, which, as it appears from the record, is not approved either by the sheriff or the judge who tried the cause. Article 918, C. C. P., as amended by Acts 36th Leg. (1919), c. 18 (Vernon’s Ann. Code Cr. Proc. Supp. 1922, art. 918); Sweak v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 239 S. W. 615; Smith v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 244 S. W. 511.

For the defect in the bond, the appeal must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, J.

Appellant was convicted of a misdemeanor, from which he appeals. He seeks enlargement pending the same upon a bond, which, as it appears from the record, is not approved either by the sheriff or the judge who tried the cause. Article 918, C. C. P., as amended by Acts 36th Leg. (1919), c. 18 (Vernon’s Ann. Code Cr. Proc. Supp. 1922, art. 918); Sweak v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 239 S. W. 615; Smith v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 244 S. W. 511.

For the defect in the bond, the appeal must be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 S.W. 288, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-state-texcrimapp-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack