Brown v. State
247 S.W. 288, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 928
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of a misdemeanor, from which he appeals. He seeks enlargement pending the same upon a bond, which, as it appears from the record, is not approved either by the sheriff or the judge who tried the cause. Article 918, C. C. P., as amended by Acts 36th Leg. (1919), c. 18 (Vernon’s Ann. Code Cr. Proc. Supp. 1922, art. 918); Sweak v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 239 S. W. 615; Smith v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 244 S. W. 511.
For the defect in the bond, the appeal must be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. State, 247 S.W. 288, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 928 (Tex. 1923).
247 S.W. 288 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kunz v. State
310 S.W.2d 583 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1958)