Brown v. State

224 S.W. 1105, 88 Tex. Crim. 55, 1920 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 344
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 27, 1920·No. No. 5860.·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinions

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a murder conviction from Upshur county.

An inspection of the record discloses that the appeal bond is insufficient in that it is not endorsed and approved by the trial judge. The statute requires that where notice of appeal is given to the court of Criminal Appeals a recognizance must be taken in term time, and in default of that a bond can be taken in vacation, but when so taken it must be approved by both the officer having him in charge and the trial judge who presided over the trial.

The bond is insufficient and the appeal must, therefore, be dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 224 S.W. 1105, 88 Tex. Crim. 55, 1920 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 344 (Tex. 1920).

224 S.W. 1105 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glover v. State
152 S.W.2d 747 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1941)
Cole v. State
44 S.W.2d 722 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Smith v. State
42 S.W.2d 787 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Franks v. State
42 S.W.2d 1016 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Lopez v. State
17 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Johnson v. State
275 S.W. 1036 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Jones v. State
267 S.W. 985 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Vineyard v. State
257 S.W. 548 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1923)
Willingham v. State
252 S.W. 530 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1923)