Franks v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Franks v. State

42 S.W.2d 1016, 118 Tex. Crim. 96, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 563

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 17, 1931

DocketNo. 14357

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 42 S.W.2d 1016 (Franks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Franks v. State, 42 S.W.2d 1016, 118 Tex. Crim. 96, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 563 (Tex. 1931).

Pincite

Opinions

CALHOUN, Judge.

Offense, embezzlement of money over the value of $50; punishment, eight years in the penitentiary.

We find no recognizance in the record. There is an appeal bond which is approved by the district judge but not by the sheriff. The law requires the approval of both. See article 818, C. C. P. Jones v. State, 99 Texas Crim. Rep., 50, 267 S. W., 985; Brown v. State, 88 Texas Crim. Rep., 55, 224 S. W., 1105; Leal v. State, 112 Texas Crim. Rep., 479, 17 S. W. (2d) 1064; Shaw v. State, 113 Texas Crim. Rep., 646, 21 S. W. (2d) 1049.

In the absence of a recognizance or an appeal bond approved as the law requires, this court is without jurisdiction to pass on the merits of the case.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI