Mitchell v. State

67 S.W.2d 296, 125 Tex. Crim. 157, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 21
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 10, 1934·No. No. 16549.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquor; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year and six months.

The proceedings appear regular, including the indictment, the charge of the court and the verdict of the jury. The facts heard upon the trial are not brought up for review.

There is some complaint of giving to the jury alternate forms upon which they might write the verdict. The practice has in some instances been regarded as not advisable, but in the absence of injury has never been held reversible error.

Perceiving no error justifying a reversal, the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell v. State, 67 S.W.2d 296, 125 Tex. Crim. 157, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 21 (Tex. 1934).

67 S.W.2d 296 (Mitchell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Capps v. State
696 S.W.2d 486 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)