Brown v. State

224 S.W. 1098, 88 Tex. Crim. 60, 1920 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 346
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 27, 1920·No. No. 5918.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of manslaughter and allotted two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us containing a sentence, which, ordinarily, presupposes that a judgment was rendered, but the record is silent as to whether there was a judgment entered upon the verdict or not. There is a verdict set out in the record, but there is not a judgment *61 rendered upon the verdict, showing the pleadings, the empanelling of the jury, or any of those constituent elements required by the statute. In this condition of the record the judgment will have to be reversed for want of a judgment. The final sentence can not take the place of the judgment of the court rendered upon the verdict. The sentence is the final judgment which authorized the appeal, but without a judgment the sentence is unauthorized. In this condition of the record the judgment will have to be reversed and the cause remanded, which is accordingly done.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. State, 224 S.W. 1098, 88 Tex. Crim. 60, 1920 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 346 (Tex. 1920).

224 S.W. 1098 (Brown v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Horn v. State
35 S.W.2d 145 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)