Horn v. State

35 S.W.2d 145, 117 Tex. Crim. 22, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 264
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 21, 1931
DocketNo. 13790.
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 35 S.W.2d 145 (Horn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Horn v. State, 35 S.W.2d 145, 117 Tex. Crim. 22, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 264 (Tex. 1931).

Opinions

The offense is arson; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for three years.

We find copied in the transcript before us the notice of appeal, sentence and recognizance. There is nothing to show that these are recorded in the minutes of the court, as required by law. Rogers v. State, 85 Tex.Crim. Rep.,213 S.W. 637.

The record contains no judgment rendered upon' the verdict of the jury. The sentence can not take the place of the judgment of the court rendered upon the verdict. The sentence was the final judgment which authorized the appeal, but without a judgment the court was unauthorized to pronounce sentence. Brown v. State, 88 Tex.Crim. Rep., 224 S.W. 1098. If we had jurisdiction of the case it would be incumbent upon us to reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause because of the failure of the record to show that judgment was entered. If judgment was entered, the duty rests upon the representatives of the state to show such fact.

Because the record fails to show that notice of appeal, sentence and recognizance were recorded in the minutes of the court, the appeal is dismissed. Appellant is granted fifteen days from this date in which to perfect the record.

Appeal dismissed. *Page 24

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Hawkins, J., absent.

ON REINSTATEMENT OF APPEAL.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duran, Francisco Jr.
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Larry Don Johnson v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006
Ex Parte Johnson
697 S.W.2d 605 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Morgan v. State
515 S.W.2d 278 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1974)
Hay v. State
472 S.W.2d 157 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Stilwell v. State
434 S.W.2d 861 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1968)
Cunningham v. State
322 S.W.2d 538 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1959)
Browder v. State
286 S.W.2d 636 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1956)
Moore v. State
227 S.W.2d 219 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1950)
Caviness v. State
200 S.W.2d 1017 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1947)
Broner v. State
200 S.W.2d 191 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1947)
Caldwell v. State
56 S.W.2d 883 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Howell v. State
47 S.W.2d 844 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Williams v. State
42 S.W.2d 441 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 S.W.2d 145, 117 Tex. Crim. 22, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horn-v-state-texcrimapp-1931.