Rogers v. State

213 S.W. 637, 85 Tex. Crim. 421
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 11, 1919·No. No. 5401·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

MORROW, J.

[1] The Assistant Attorney General has presented a motion to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the record fails to show an entry on the minutes of the court of the notice of appeal or the recognizance. We find copied in the transcript before us copies of the appeal and recognizance, but the point is made that there is nothing to show that these are recorded in the minutes of the court as required by law. This should appear from the certificate of the clerk, but in the. present instance the certificate is to the effect that it. contains a correct transcript of the proceedings had as the same appeared on file. If, as stated in the certificate, the matters copied in the record are merely from something that is on file, the law is not complied with, and since the only evidence we have to guide us is the certificate of the clerk we must, since the point is made, sustain the motion. We will say, however, that if the notice of appeal and recognizance are in fact recorded in the minutes of the court, that'permission will be granted to amend the certificate to accord with the facts.

The motion is sustained, and the appeal dismissed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rogers v. State, 213 S.W. 637, 85 Tex. Crim. 421 (Tex. 1919).

213 S.W. 637 (Rogers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

White v. United States
283 A.2d 21 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1971)
Long v. State
113 S.W.2d 1244 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Horn v. State
35 S.W.2d 145 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Wheeler v. State
42 S.W.2d 69 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Gerlach v. State
29 S.W.2d 349 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Hodge v. State
277 S.W. 643 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)