Barnaby v. State

268 S.W. 470, 99 Tex. Crim. 159, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 82
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 7, 1925·No. No. 8595.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

The offense is the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of one year.

The recognizance, as contained in the record, is defective in that it states that the appellant "stands charged in this court with the offense of violating the prohibition law." This does not name any offense denounced in our Penal Code. The form of recognizance demanded by the legislature expressly requires that the recognizance state the offense of which the accused has been convicted. See Art. 903, C. C. P.

The State's Attorney insists upon a dismissal of the appeal. The appellant being at large, a proper recognizance is essential in order to give this court jurisdiction. See McKey v. State, 87 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Singleton v. State,87 Tex. Crim. 302; Goss v. State, 83 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Godby v. State, 227 S.W. Rep., 192; Westbrook v. State, 227 S.W. Rep., 1104; Robert v. State, 228 S.W. Rep., 230.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnaby v. State, 268 S.W. 470, 99 Tex. Crim. 159, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 82 (Tex. 1925).

268 S.W. 470 (Barnaby v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Saladina v. State
32 S.W.2d 465 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)