Westbrook v. State

227 S.W. 1104, 88 Tex. Crim. 466, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 279
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 26, 1921
DocketNo. 5959.
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 227 S.W. 1104 (Westbrook v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Westbrook v. State, 227 S.W. 1104, 88 Tex. Crim. 466, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 279 (Tex. 1921).

Opinions

The State has moved to dismiss this appeal for the want of a sufficient recognizance. The only recognizance appearing in the record is as follows: "This day came into open court Will Westbrook, defendant in the above entitled and numbered cause, who together with S.R. Harper, J.R. White and Toney White, Sureties, acknowledge themselves jointly and severally indebted to the State of Texas in the sum of Fifteen Hundred ($1500) conditioned that the said Will Westbrook who stands charged with the offense of a felony, to-wit — Unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors in this court, shall appear before this court from day to day and from term to term of the same and not depart therefrom, without leave of this court, in order to abide a judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of the State of Texas in this cause." This appears to be, in form, such a recognizance as is required for the appearance of the accused under Article 315 of our C.C.P., and is not the recognizance required upon appeal under Articles 902 and 903, C.C.P. Same nowhere states that appellant has been convicted of any named offense, either misdemeanor or felony, and is insufficient.

The motion is sustained and the appeal dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Drake Jordan Finch v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Daniel Everett Brooks v. State
382 S.W.3d 601 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2012)
Childress v. State
807 S.W.2d 424 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Wingate v. State
487 S.W.2d 89 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1972)
Privitt v. State
98 S.W.2d 204 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Stanford v. State
269 S.W. 437 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Barnaby v. State
268 S.W. 470 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Reed v. State
267 S.W. 271 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Staten v. State
246 S.W. 387 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Craig v. State
224 S.W. 614 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Thompson v. State
234 S.W. 400 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)
Thomas v. State
230 S.W. 159 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
227 S.W. 1104, 88 Tex. Crim. 466, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westbrook-v-state-texcrimapp-1921.