Thompson v. State
This text of 228 S.W. 224 (Thompson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon an indictment for murder the appellant was convicted of manslaughter, with a punishment of two years in the penitentiary.
No statement of facts accompanies the record. No objections were made to the court’s charge, and no exceptions were reserved to failure to give special charges which were refused, and in the absence of exceptions and statement of facts this court is in no position to review the matter of such failure. The record does not even contain a motion for new trial, but states: “Defendant’s motion for new trial has been misplaced by the attorneys and cannot be located.”
No errors appearing on the face of the record, the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
228 S.W. 224, 88 Tex. Crim. 560, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-state-texcrimapp-1921.