Glenn v. Doyal

Supreme Court

Glenn v. Doyal

285 U.S. 526, 52 S. Ct. 404, 76 L. Ed. 923, 1932 U.S. LEXIS 463

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 21, 1932

DocketNo. 526

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 285 U.S. 526 (Glenn v. Doyal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glenn v. Doyal, 285 U.S. 526, 52 S. Ct. 404, 76 L. Ed. 923, 1932 U.S. LEXIS 463 (1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Moffitt v. Kelly, 218 U. S. 400, 404, 405; Nickel v. Cole, 256 U. S. 222, 226; Iowa Central Ry. [527]*527Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389, 393; Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674, 683; Lombard v. West Chicago Park Commissioners, 181 U. S. 33, 42, 43; French v. Taylor, 199 U. S. 274, 277; Rawlins v. Georgia, 201 U. S. 638, 639, 640; Hannis Distilling Co. v. Baltimore, 216 U. S. 285, 294; De Bearn v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co., 233 U. S. 24, 34; McDonald v. Oregon Navigation Co., 233 U. S. 665, 669, 670; St. Louis Land Co. v. Kansas City, 241 U. S. 419, 427; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316, 317; Sandel v. South Carolina, 269 U. S. 532; Boyd v. Smythe, 270 U. S. 635.

Mr. John A. Sibley, with whom Messrs. Marion Smith and Herman Swift were on the brief, for appellant. Messrs. George M. Napier, Attorney General of Georgia, Orville A. Park, and John A. Smith were on the brief for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Moffitt v. Kelly, 218 U. S. 400, 404, 405; Nickel v. Cole, 256 U. S. 222, 226; Iowa Central Ry. [527]*527Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389, 393; Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674, 683; Lombard v. West Chicago Park Commissioners, 181 U. S. 33, 42, 43; French v. Taylor, 199 U. S. 274, 277; Rawlins v. Georgia, 201 U. S. 638, 639, 640; Hannis Distilling Co. v. Baltimore, 216 U. S. 285, 294; De Bearn v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co., 233 U. S. 24, 34; McDonald v. Oregon Navigation Co., 233 U. S. 665, 669, 670; St. Louis Land Co. v. Kansas City, 241 U. S. 419, 427; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316, 317; Sandel v. South Carolina, 269 U. S. 532; Boyd v. Smythe, 270 U. S. 635.

Mr. John A. Sibley, with whom Messrs. Marion Smith and Herman Swift were on the brief, for appellant. Messrs. George M. Napier, Attorney General of Georgia, Orville A. Park, and John A. Smith were on the brief for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 U.S. 526, 52 S. Ct. 404, 76 L. Ed. 923, 1932 U.S. LEXIS 463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glenn-v-doyal-scotus-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack