Schmeling v. F. W. Woolworth Co.
This text of 290 U.S. 605 (Schmeling v. F. W. Woolworth Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. New York Central R. Co. v. White, 243 U.S. 188; Mountain Timber Co. v. Washington, 243 U.S. 219; Lower Vein Co. v. Industrial Board, 255 U.S. 144; Madera Sugar Pine Co. v. Industrial Commission, 262 U.S. 499; Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U.S. 674; 683; McDonald v. Oregon Navigation Co., 233 U.S. 665, 669, 670; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U.S. 312, 316, 317; Glenn v. Doyal, 285 U.S. 526.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
290 U.S. 605, 54 S. Ct. 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmeling-v-f-w-woolworth-co-scotus-1934.