Sandel v. South Carolina

Supreme Court

Sandel v. South Carolina

269 U.S. 532, 46 S. Ct. 100

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 26, 1925·No. No. 118·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Iowa Central Ry. Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389, 393; Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674, 683; Rawlins v. Georgia, 201 U. S. 638; Burt v. Smith, 203 U. S. 129, 136; Standard Oil Co. v. Missouri, 224 U. S. 270, 281; DeBearn v. Safe Deposit Co., 233 U. S. 24, 34; McDonald v. Oregon R. R. & Navigation Co., 233 U. S. 665, 669-670; Gasquet v. Lapeyre, 242 U. S. 367, 369, 370:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Iowa Central Ry. Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389, 393; Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674, 683; Rawlins v. Georgia, 201 U. S. 638; Burt v. Smith, 203 U. S. 129, 136; Standard Oil Co. v. Missouri, 224 U. S. 270, 281; DeBearn v. Safe Deposit Co., 233 U. S. 24, 34; McDonald v. Oregon R. R. & Navigation Co., 233 U. S. 665, 669-670; Gasquet v. Lapeyre, 242 U. S. 367, 369, 370:

Sandel v. South Carolina, 269 U.S. 532, 46 S. Ct. 100 (1925).

Pincite

269 U.S. 532 (Sandel v. South Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related