Boyd v. Smythe

270 U.S. 635, 46 S. Ct. 470, 70 L. Ed. 772, 1926 U.S. LEXIS 463
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 12, 1926·No. No. 871·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Application for a writ of super-sedeas and for leave to file a bond denied; motion for leave to amend the petition in error denied, and the writ of error dismissed, for want of jurisdiction, upon thé authority of Iowa C. R. Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389, 393; Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674, 683; Rawlins v. Georgia, 201 U. S. 638; Burt v. Smith, 203 U. S. 129; Standard Oil Co. v. Missouri, 224 U. S. 270, 281; DeBearn v. Safe Deposit & Trust Company, 233 U. S. 24, 34; McDonald v. Oregon R. R. & Nav. Co., 233 U. S. 665, 669, 670; Gasquet v. Lapeyre, 242 U. S. 367, 369, 370; (2) McCain v. Des Moines, 174 U. S. 168, 181; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U. S. 239, 243; Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U. S. 526, 530; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, [636]*636147.

Mr. Lloyd L. Duke for plaintiff in error. Messrs. Benjamin J. Gibson and Neill Garrett for defendant in error. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boyd v. Smythe, 270 U.S. 635, 46 S. Ct. 470, 70 L. Ed. 772, 1926 U.S. LEXIS 463 (1926).

270 U.S. 635 (Boyd v. Smythe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glenn v. Doyal
285 U.S. 526 (Supreme Court, 1932)