Gabbi Lemos v. County of Sonoma
This text of 22 F.4th 1179 (Gabbi Lemos v. County of Sonoma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 21 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GABBI LEMOS, No. 19-15222
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:15-cv-05188-YGR Northern District of California, v. Oakland
COUNTY OF SONOMA; STEVE ORDER FREITAS; MARCUS HOLTON,
Defendants-Appellees.
MURGUIA, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that
this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)
and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.
Judge Koh did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 F.4th 1179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gabbi-lemos-v-county-of-sonoma-ca9-2022.