Fisher v. Pearson
This text of 57 S.E. 1018 (Fisher v. Pearson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. A writ of error lies to a judgment in a superior court refusing a motion to reinstate a dismissed appeal case. Van Dyke v. Van Dyke, 120 Ga. 984; Aiken v. Peck, 72 Ga. 434.
2. When, in case of attachment served by process of garnishment, judgment has been entered against the defendant in attachment, and also against the garnishee, for the full amount sued for, and the defendant appeals, with the garnishee as sole surety on his appeal bond, such bond is a nullity, and the appeal is properly dismissed. McMurria v. Powell, 120 Ga. 766; Napier v. Woodall, 118 Ga. 830 (2) ; Harvely v. [518]*518Daley, 112 Ga. 822; Benson v. Shines, 107 Ga. 406; Gordon v. Robertson, 26 Ga. 410; Eufaula Home Ins. Co. v. Plant, 36 Ga. 623; Osborne v. Hughes, 93 Ga. 445. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 S.E. 1018, 1 Ga. App. 517, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-pearson-gactapp-1907.