Gordon v. Robertson
This text of 26 Ga. 410 (Gordon v. Robertson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
The only persons who signed the appeal bond as sureties, are parties defendant in the cause, against whom the plaintiff had recovered a verdict. There was no attempt or offer to give any security, for the bond of these parties gave no additional guaranty to the plaintiff, or strength to the demand on which he had recovered the verdict. It was, therefore, neither a compliance, nor an attempt to comply, with the requisitions of the statute, to give the plaintiff security for the eventual condemnation money.
It follows that the appeal was not good, as to the defendant, Gordon. There is no precedent for the motion made in this case. There is nothing like it in any of the adjudicated cases, and they have gone quite far enough.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 Ga. 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-robertson-ga-1858.