Paschal & Son v. Moline Jewelry Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Paschal & Son v. Moline Jewelry Co.

58 S.E. 488, 2 Ga. App. 322, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 357

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 10, 1907

Docket456

StatusPublished

This text of 58 S.E. 488 (Paschal & Son v. Moline Jewelry Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paschal & Son v. Moline Jewelry Co., 58 S.E. 488, 2 Ga. App. 322, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 357 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Powell, J.

A judgment was rendered in a county court against the individual members of a partnership; an appeal was entered in the name of the partnership by its attorney at law, and the sole surety wras one of the partners against whom judgment'had been rendered., Meld, that the appeal was a nullity, was not amendable, and was properly dismissed on motion. Gordy v. Robertson, 26 Ga. 410, and cases cited in the footnotes; Fisher v. Pearson, 1 Ga. App. 517, and cit., 57 S. E. 1018.

Judgment affirmed.

Appeal, from Putnam superior court — Judge Lewis. March 18, 1907.

Submitted June 25, Decided July 10, 1907. W. T. Davidson, for plaintiff in error. Turner & Adams, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI