Paschal & Son v. Moline Jewelry Co.
58 S.E. 488, 2 Ga. App. 322, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 357
Opinion
A judgment was rendered in a county court against the individual members of a partnership; an appeal was entered in the name of the partnership by its attorney at law, and the sole surety wras one of the partners against whom judgment'had been rendered., Meld, that the appeal was a nullity, was not amendable, and was properly dismissed on motion. Gordy v. Robertson, 26 Ga. 410, and cases cited in the footnotes; Fisher v. Pearson, 1 Ga. App. 517, and cit., 57 S. E. 1018.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Paschal & Son v. Moline Jewelry Co., 58 S.E. 488, 2 Ga. App. 322, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 357 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).
58 S.E. 488 (Paschal & Son v. Moline Jewelry Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gordon v. Robertson
26 Ga. 410 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1858)
Fisher v. Pearson
57 S.E. 1018 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)