Eufaula Home Insurance v. Plant & Cubbedge

36 Ga. 623
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 15, 1867·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Walker, J.

This case is fully within the principle decided by this Court in the case of Gordon vs. Robertson, 26 Ga. R., 410. There, as here, judgment had gone against all the parties who signed the appeal bond. Here was no attempt or offer to give any security. There was neither a compliance, nor an attempt to comply, with the requisitions of the statute, to give the plaintiff security for the eventual condemnation money. There is nothing like this case in any of the adjudicated cases, and they have gone quite far enough. '

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eufaula Home Insurance v. Plant & Cubbedge, 36 Ga. 623 (Ga. 1867).

36 Ga. 623 (Eufaula Home Insurance v. Plant & Cubbedge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Samples v. Samples
21 S.E.2d 601 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Levin v. American Furniture Co.
66 S.E. 888 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Fisher v. Pearson
57 S.E. 1018 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Napier Bros. v. Woodall
45 S.E. 684 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Benson v. Shines
33 S.E. 439 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Stewart v. Hall
32 S.E. 14 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)