Harvely v. Daly & Co.
This text of 38 S.E. 41 (Harvely v. Daly & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where a claimant of funds in the hands of a garnishee dissolves the garnishment by giving bond with security as required by section 4720 of the Civil Code, and, on the trial of the issue formed on his traverse of the answer of the garnishee, judgment is rendered finding the issue against the claimant, his surety on the bond given to dissolve the garnishment becomes [823]*823thereby bound with the claimant for the payment of the judgment rendered on the garnishment; and where on an appeal from this judgment it appears that the only surety on the appeal bond is the same person who is surety on the bond to dissolve the garnishment, and against whom judgment has already been rendered, the appeal is a nullity; and the trial judge commits no error in dismissing the same, and in refusing to allow the appellant to amend his appeal bond by giving security. Benson v. Shines, 107 Ga. 406, and cases there cited.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 S.E. 41, 112 Ga. 822, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harvely-v-daly-co-ga-1901.