Edwards v. State
This text of 444 So. 2d 581 (Edwards v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We find that sufficient evidence was presented to justify revocation of appellant’s probation on the grounds that he failed to report to his probation officer, inform him of his correct address and whereabouts and attend a work program as he had agreed to do. However, we strike from the revocation order the finding that appellant violated condition two of his probation which required him to pay the cost of supervision since no evidence was presented showing that he had the ability to make such payments. See Cephas v. State, 412 So.2d 935 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Deason v. State, 404 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
444 So. 2d 581, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.