Edwards v. State

410 So. 2d 635, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19403
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 4, 1982·No. No. AI-112·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Allen Edwards appeals from an order denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of CriminaL Procedure. While the trial court found in its order that Edwards was not advised of the time limits relating to his right to appeal nor of his right to counsel on appeal, the denial of Rule 3.850 relief was proper because this error does not affect the validity of the conviction and sentence. We note that the trial court correctly appointed counsel for the purpose of seeking permission from this court to bring an untimely appeal pursuant to Hollingshead v. Wainwright, 194 So.2d 577 (Fla.1967). Ac[636]*636cordingly, the denial of post-conviction relief is AFFIRMED without prejudice to Edwards’ right to seek belated appellate review through his court-appointed counsel.

BOOTH, SHIVERS and JOANOS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwards v. State, 410 So. 2d 635, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19403 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

410 So. 2d 635 (Edwards v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Anderson
215 So. 3d 181 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
State v. Isaac L. Anderson, Jr.
215 So. 3d 181 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Williams v. State
454 So. 2d 756 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)