Edwards v. State

411 So. 2d 274, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19443
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 11, 1982·No. No. AF-100·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the trial court’s modification of his probation upon it finding that he had violated two conditions thereof by:

Violating Condition (4) in that on May 2, 1981, the aforesaid was in possession of a firearm, to wit: a Remington 1100 shotgun.
Violating Condition (5) in that the aforesaid violated the law by his arrest on May 22, 1981, for the offense of grand theft.

The evidence is insufficient to support a modification based on a violation of Condition (5). However, there is sufficient evidence to modify on the basis of a violation of Condition (4). Therefore, we affirm the modification on that ground.

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, ERVIN and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwards v. State, 411 So. 2d 274, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19443 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

411 So. 2d 274 (Edwards v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hansen v. Wainwright
493 So. 2d 38 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)