Edwards v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Edwards v. State

410 So. 2d 635, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19403

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 4, 1982

DocketNo. AI-112

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 410 So. 2d 635 (Edwards v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edwards v. State, 410 So. 2d 635, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19403 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Allen Edwards appeals from an order denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of CriminaL Procedure. While the trial court found in its order that Edwards was not advised of the time limits relating to his right to appeal nor of his right to counsel on appeal, the denial of Rule 3.850 relief was proper because this error does not affect the validity of the conviction and sentence. We note that the trial court correctly appointed counsel for the purpose of seeking permission from this court to bring an untimely appeal pursuant to Hollingshead v. Wainwright, 194 So.2d 577 (Fla.1967). Ac[636]*636cordingly, the denial of post-conviction relief is AFFIRMED without prejudice to Edwards’ right to seek belated appellate review through his court-appointed counsel.

BOOTH, SHIVERS and JOANOS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Allen Edwards appeals from an order denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of CriminaL Procedure. While the trial court found in its order that Edwards was not advised of the time limits relating to his right to appeal nor of his right to counsel on appeal, the denial of Rule 3.850 relief was proper because this error does not affect the validity of the conviction and sentence. We note that the trial court correctly appointed counsel for the purpose of seeking permission from this court to bring an untimely appeal pursuant to Hollingshead v. Wainwright, 194 So.2d 577 (Fla.1967). Ac[636]*636cordingly, the denial of post-conviction relief is AFFIRMED without prejudice to Edwards’ right to seek belated appellate review through his court-appointed counsel.

BOOTH, SHIVERS and JOANOS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

410 So. 2d 635, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack