Cephas v. State
412 So. 2d 935, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19794
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 16, 1982·No. No. 81-605·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Appellant’s probation was revoked for (1) failure to submit monthly supervision fees and (2) failure to make three monthly reports. The record is void of any finding concerning solvency as required in Peterson v. State, 384 So.2d 965 (Fla.2d DCA 1980). But there is substantial evidence to support the revocation for failure to submit monthly reports. Accordingly, we strike the count which pertains to failure to submit monthly supervision fees. We affirm appellant’s revocation on the remaining count.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cephas v. State, 412 So. 2d 935, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19794 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
412 So. 2d 935 (Cephas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Edwards v. State
444 So. 2d 581 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Rodriguez v. State
442 So. 2d 1036 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Vázquez v. Caraballo
114 P.R. Dec. 272 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1983)