Cephas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cephas v. State

412 So. 2d 935, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19794

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 16, 1982

DocketNo. 81-605

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 412 So. 2d 935 (Cephas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cephas v. State, 412 So. 2d 935, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19794 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s probation was revoked for (1) failure to submit monthly supervision fees and (2) failure to make three monthly reports. The record is void of any finding concerning solvency as required in Peterson v. State, 384 So.2d 965 (Fla.2d DCA 1980). But there is substantial evidence to support the revocation for failure to submit monthly reports. Accordingly, we strike the count which pertains to failure to submit monthly supervision fees. We affirm appellant’s revocation on the remaining count.

SCHEB, C. J., and HOBSON and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s probation was revoked for (1) failure to submit monthly supervision fees and (2) failure to make three monthly reports. The record is void of any finding concerning solvency as required in Peterson v. State, 384 So.2d 965 (Fla.2d DCA 1980). But there is substantial evidence to support the revocation for failure to submit monthly reports. Accordingly, we strike the count which pertains to failure to submit monthly supervision fees. We affirm appellant’s revocation on the remaining count.

SCHEB, C. J., and HOBSON and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

412 So. 2d 935, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cephas-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack