Dukes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dukes v. State

808 So. 2d 276, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2210, 2002 WL 313162

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 1, 2002

DocketNo. 1D00-4026

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 808 So. 2d 276 (Dukes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dukes v. State, 808 So. 2d 276, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2210, 2002 WL 313162 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the constitutionality of section 775.087(2)-(7), Florida Statutes (1999), the 10/20/Life statute, on the basis that the statute violates the separation of powers provision and the single subject requirement in the Florida Constitution. We affirm.

This Court has previously rejected separation of powers challenges to the 10/20/ Life statute. See Hagan v. State, 793 So.2d 1168 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Green v. State, 792 So.2d 643 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). We do not reach the merits of the appellant’s single subject claim as he failed to preserve the issue for appellate review. See Harvey v. State, 786 So.2d 595 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, BARFIELD and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI