Dukes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dukes v. State

805 So. 2d 884, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13936, 2001 WL 1284585

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 5, 2001

DocketNo. 2D01-2981

StatusPublished

This text of 805 So. 2d 884 (Dukes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dukes v. State, 805 So. 2d 884, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13936, 2001 WL 1284585 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Clarence Dukes timely appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The trial court did not rule on the merits of his motion but found it duplicative to a motion filed by Dukes in 1996. The trial court’s finding is incorrect. Dukes raised new sentencing issues in the most recent motion; however, these issues are without merit. We affirm.

Affirmed.

WHATLEY, A.C.J., and GREEN and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Clarence Dukes timely appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The trial court did not rule on the merits of his motion but found it duplicative to a motion filed by Dukes in 1996. The trial court’s finding is incorrect. Dukes raised new sentencing issues in the most recent motion; however, these issues are without merit. We affirm.

Affirmed.

WHATLEY, A.C.J., and GREEN and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

805 So. 2d 884, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13936, 2001 WL 1284585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dukes-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.