Hagan v. State
This text of 793 So. 2d 1168 (Hagan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Joshua HAGAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nancy Daniels, Public Defender, and M.J. Lord, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Robert L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges the constitutionality of the 10/20/Life statute on grounds that it violates the Florida Constitution's separation of powers provision and single subject requirement. We affirm.
Appellant's separation of powers challenge has already been rejected by this court in Green v. State, 792 So.2d 643 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). We do not reach the merits of appellant's single subject challenge as it was not properly preserved for appellate review. See Harvey v. State, 786 So.2d 595, reh'g denied, 786 So.2d 28 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).
WOLF, KAHN and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
793 So. 2d 1168, 2001 WL 1045888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hagan-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.