Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Dukes v. State

Dukes v. State

805 So. 2d 884, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13936, 2001 WL 1284585
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dukes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8680 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 5, 2001·No. No. 2D01-2981·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Clarence Dukes timely appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The trial court did not rule on the merits of his motion but found it duplicative to a motion filed by Dukes in 1996. The trial court’s finding is incorrect. Dukes raised new sentencing issues in the most recent motion; however, these issues are without merit. We affirm.

Affirmed.

WHATLEY, A.C.J., and GREEN and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dukes v. State, 805 So. 2d 884, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13936, 2001 WL 1284585 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

805 So. 2d 884 (Dukes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.