Dukes v. State
737 So. 2d 595, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8680, 1999 WL 521499
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 30, 1999·No. No. 98-4005·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm the denial of appellant’s post-conviction motion, because the record demonstrates that the written habitual offender sentence did conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dukes v. State, 737 So. 2d 595, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8680, 1999 WL 521499 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
737 So. 2d 595 (Dukes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. State
789 So. 2d 1112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Denmark v. Michael
737 So. 2d 595 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)