Dukes v. State
737 So. 2d 595, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8680, 1999 WL 521499
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 30, 1999
DocketNo. 98-4005
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 737 So. 2d 595 (Dukes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dukes v. State, 737 So. 2d 595, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8680, 1999 WL 521499 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
Opinion
We affirm the denial of appellant’s post-conviction motion, because the record demonstrates that the written habitual offender sentence did conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Williams v. State
789 So. 2d 1112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Denmark v. Michael
737 So. 2d 595 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
737 So. 2d 595, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8680, 1999 WL 521499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dukes-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.