Douglas v. State

623 So. 2d 1253, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9930, 1993 WL 383495
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 1, 1993
DocketNo. 92-01378
StatusPublished

This text of 623 So. 2d 1253 (Douglas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Douglas v. State, 623 So. 2d 1253, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9930, 1993 WL 383495 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences because there was sufficient proof that appellant violated the terms and conditions of his community control. However, we remand for correction of the order revoking community control. That order erroneously recited that appellant had been found guilty of violating conditions six (commission of a new criminal offense) and eight (failure to work diligently at a lawful occupation). Reference to these unproven charges should be deleted.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
623 So. 2d 1253, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9930, 1993 WL 383495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.