Douglas v. State
This text of 623 So. 2d 1253 (Douglas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences because there was sufficient proof that appellant violated the terms and conditions of his community control. However, we remand for correction of the order revoking community control. That order erroneously recited that appellant had been found guilty of violating conditions six (commission of a new criminal offense) and eight (failure to work diligently at a lawful occupation). Reference to these unproven charges should be deleted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
623 So. 2d 1253, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9930, 1993 WL 383495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.