Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Douglas v. State

Douglas v. State

623 So. 2d 1253, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9930, 1993 WL 383495
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Douglas v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 652 So. 2d 887 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 1, 1993·No. No. 92-01378·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences because there was sufficient proof that appellant violated the terms and conditions of his community control. However, we remand for correction of the order revoking community control. That order erroneously recited that appellant had been found guilty of violating conditions six (commission of a new criminal offense) and eight (failure to work diligently at a lawful occupation). Reference to these unproven charges should be deleted.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Douglas v. State, 623 So. 2d 1253, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9930, 1993 WL 383495 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

623 So. 2d 1253 (Douglas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.