Douglas v. State
578 So. 2d 52, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3593, 1991 WL 58883
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Douglas v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 627 So. 2d 1190 →
Opinion
Appellant contends his sentencing as an habitual offender was invalid because it was based on two prior convictions of the same date. Walker v. State, 567 So.2d 546 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). As the second supplemental record shows, this was not the case.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Douglas v. State, 578 So. 2d 52, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3593, 1991 WL 58883 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
578 So. 2d 52 (Douglas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Walker v. State
567 So. 2d 546 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)