Douglas v. State

558 So. 2d 168, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1664, 1990 WL 27949
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 14, 1990
DocketNo. 88-03406
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 558 So. 2d 168 (Douglas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Douglas v. State, 558 So. 2d 168, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1664, 1990 WL 27949 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

FRANK, Acting Chief Judge.

The appellant has raised two points on appeal, only one of which is meritorious. The order of probation placed the following conditions on the appellant’s behavior: first, he is not allowed to live with members of the opposite sex and, second, he is not to come within three blocks of a known high crime area. Both of these conditions are invalid. Huff v. State, 554 So.2d 616 (Fla.2d DCA 1989).

The conditions of probation are stricken but all other aspects of this matter are affirmed.

HALL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fullwood v. State
558 So. 2d 168 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
558 So. 2d 168, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1664, 1990 WL 27949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.