Douglas v. State

664 So. 2d 1099, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12666, 1995 WL 723530
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 8, 1995·No. No. 94-03671·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Steven Douglas appeals the trial court’s order imposing restitution. We affirm the portion of the order setting forth the amount of restitution. However, we reverse the portion of the order delegating to the probation officer the determination of the restitution payment schedule and remand for the trial court to establish the payment schedule and to enter the appropriate order. See Guinn v. State, 652 So.2d 902 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded for entry of a new order establishing the payment schedule for the restitution.

RYDER, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Douglas v. State, 664 So. 2d 1099, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12666, 1995 WL 723530 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

664 So. 2d 1099 (Douglas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pearce v. State
968 So. 2d 92 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Lewellen v. State
685 So. 2d 1367 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Mitchell v. State
664 So. 2d 1099 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)