De Vesa v. Dorsey

concluding that “the validity of the exercise of senatorial courtesy . . . does not implicate the privilege accorded to legislators under the [New Jersey Constitution’s] Speech and Debate Clause.”

Michael Giammarino and Roseann Giammarino v. Dir., Div. of Taxation

New Jersey Tax Court, 2025

concluding that “the validity of the exercise of senatorial courtesy . . . does not implicate the privilege accorded to legislators under the [New Jersey Constitution’s] Speech and Debate Clause.”

R.S. v. C v.

New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2025

explaining that an appellate court "normally will not entertain cases when a controversy no longer exists"

ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICERS PBA LOCAL 183 VS. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY (STATE HEALTH BENEFITS COMMISSION)

New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2019

noting that our courts "refrain[] from rendering advisory opinions or exercising [their] jurisdiction in the abstract."

In Re

New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2017

noting that our courts refrain from rendering advisory opinions or exercising jurisdiction "in the abstract"

In re N.J.A.C.

New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2017

noting that our courts refrain from rendering advisory opinions or exercising jurisdiction “in the abstract”

In Re

New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2017

noting that our courts refrain from rendering advisory opinions or exercising jurisdiction "in the abstract"

Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Russo

New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2012

“Unlike the Federal Constitution, the New Jersey Constitution does not confine the exercise of the judicial power to actual cases and controversies. See U.S. Const, art. Ill, § 2, cl. 1; N.J. Const, art. VI, § 1, para. 1.”

De Vesa v. Dorsey

Opinions

Related