Davis v. State
102 S.E. 840, 25 Ga. App. 31, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 576
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ga. App. 35 →
Opinion
1. The amendment to the motion for a new trial, not having been argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in'error, is treated as abandoned.
2. There was evidence which authorized the jury to find that the accused had made a free and voluntary confession of his guilt; and other corroborative evidence which, together with his confession, authorized his conviction.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. State, 102 S.E. 840, 25 Ga. App. 31, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 576 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).
102 S.E. 840 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.