Davis v. State

101 S.E. 918, 24 Ga. App. 704, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 473
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 27, 1920
Docket11066
StatusPublished

This text of 101 S.E. 918 (Davis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. State, 101 S.E. 918, 24 Ga. App. 704, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 473 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

In this case the motion for a new trial contains only the usual general grounds. There is some evidence authorizing the verdict. The trial judge who sees and hears the witnesses has some discretion in granting or refusing a new trial when the verdict is apparently decidedly against the weight of the evidence, but whenever there is any evidence, however slight, to support a verdict which has the approval of the trial judge, this court is without authority to control the judgment of the trial court. Bradham v. State, 21 Ga. App. 510 (94 S. E. 618), and cit.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Lulce, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bradham v. State
94 S.E. 618 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 S.E. 918, 24 Ga. App. 704, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-state-gactapp-1920.