Davis v. State

92 S.E. 552, 20 Ga. App. 72, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 715
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 11, 1917·No. 8338·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. A prosecution for cheating and swindling must be had in the county in which the owner of money or goods is deprived of his property by the alleged deceitful means and artful practices. Lowe v. State, 111 Ga. 650 (36 S. E. 856).

2. The evidence in this case shows that the crime (if a crime) was not committed in Cobb county, and, the question of venue being properly before the court, it was error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Wade, O. J., and, George, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 92 S.E. 552, 20 Ga. App. 72, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 715 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

92 S.E. 552 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McElmurray v. State
47 S.E.2d 139 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)