Davis v. State
88 S.E. 701, 18 Ga. App. 21, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 83
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 Ga. App. 142 →
Opinion
1. There was no material error in the trial. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. State, 88 S.E. 701, 18 Ga. App. 21, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 83 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).
88 S.E. 701 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.