Davis v. State

95 S.E. 474, 22 Ga. App. 119, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 184
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 2, 1918
Docket9486
StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.E. 474 (Davis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. State, 95 S.E. 474, 22 Ga. App. 119, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 184 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Beoyies, P. J.

1. When considered in connection with its context, the excerpt from the charge of the court, to which exception was taken, was not erroneous for the reason assigned.

2. The evidence authorized a finding that the storehouse Jin question had been broken into and entered.

3. The verdict was supported by the evidence, and the court did pot' err in refusing a new trial.

' Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur. B. N. Poltzclaw, for plaintiff in error. John P. Boss, solicitor-general, contra;'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.E. 474, 22 Ga. App. 119, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-state-gactapp-1918.