Davis v. State

101 S.E. 918, 24 Ga. App. 704, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 473
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ga. App. 35
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 27, 1920·No. 11066·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

In this case the motion for a new trial contains only the usual general grounds. There is some evidence authorizing the verdict. The trial judge who sees and hears the witnesses has some discretion in granting or refusing a new trial when the verdict is apparently decidedly against the weight of the evidence, but whenever there is any evidence, however slight, to support a verdict which has the approval of the trial judge, this court is without authority to control the judgment of the trial court. Bradham v. State, 21 Ga. App. 510 (94 S. E. 618), and cit.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Lulce, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 101 S.E. 918, 24 Ga. App. 704, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 473 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

101 S.E. 918 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bradham v. State
94 S.E. 618 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)