Cox v. State

234 S.W. 531, 90 Tex. Crim. 256, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 99
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 9, 1921·No. No. 6423.·Published·Cited by 24 cases

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judgu.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Shelby county of possessing equipment for making intoxicating liquor. But one question will be noticed.

Under Section 1 of the Dean Law it was made penal to possess equipment for making spirituous, vinous or malt liquor, or other intoxicant, and the prosecution and conviction herein was under- said Section 1. Said Sections 1 and 2 were amended by what is Chapter 61, Acts First and Second Called Sessions, Thirty-seventh Legislature. An examination of said amended statutes discloses that possession of such equipment is not enumerated in the forbidden acts. This constitutes a repeal of the law under which appellant was convicted, and under our statutes and all of. our decisions we have no option but to direct that this case be reversed and dismissed. Art. 16, Vernon’s P. C.; Holden v. State, 1 Texas Crim. App. 225; Harold v. State, 16 Texas Crim. App. 157; State v. Andrews, 20 Texas, 230; Chambers v State, 25 Texas, 307.

The cause will be reversed and ordered dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cox v. State, 234 S.W. 531, 90 Tex. Crim. 256, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 99 (Tex. 1921).

234 S.W. 531 (Cox v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vandyke, Roger Dale
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2017
Mendoza v. State
460 S.W.2d 145 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1970)
Jordan v. State
239 S.W. 946 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)
McLaughlin v. State
238 S.W. 919 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Parrish v. State
238 S.W. 920 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Slocovich v. State
237 S.W. 557 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Ex Parte Andres
237 S.W. 283 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Ex Parte Mitchum
237 S.W. 936 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Marshall v. State
236 S.W. 721 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Kitchens v. State
236 S.W. 476 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Stephenson v. State
236 S.W. 476 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Williams v. State
235 S.W. 1092 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)
Lee v. State
235 S.W. 1093 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)
Dossett v. State
235 S.W. 1093 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)
Davis v. State
235 S.W. 1094 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)
Holland v. State
235 S.W. 213 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)
Hadnot v. State
233 S.W. 1102 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)
McCowan v. State
234 S.W. 887 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)
Betts and Tucker v. State
235 S.W. 597 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)