McLaughlin v. State

238 S.W. 919, 91 Tex. Crim. 348, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 191
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 22, 1922
DocketNo. 6764.
StatusPublished

This text of 238 S.W. 919 (McLaughlin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McLaughlin v. State, 238 S.W. 919, 91 Tex. Crim. 348, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 191 (Tex. 1922).

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

—The conviction is for the unlawful possession of equipment for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor.

The conviction cannot stand for the reason that the act denouncing the offense was repealed, and under Article 16 of the Penal Code, the prosecution must abate. Cox v. State, 90 Texas Crim. Rep. 256 and 234 S. W. Rep. 531.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cox v. State
234 S.W. 531 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
238 S.W. 919, 91 Tex. Crim. 348, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclaughlin-v-state-texcrimapp-1922.