McLaughlin v. State
238 S.W. 919, 91 Tex. Crim. 348, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 191
Opinion
—The conviction is for the unlawful possession of equipment for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor.
The conviction cannot stand for the reason that the act denouncing the offense was repealed, and under Article 16 of the Penal Code, the prosecution must abate. Cox v. State, 90 Texas Crim. Rep. 256 and 234 S. W. Rep. 531.
The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
Reversed and dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McLaughlin v. State, 238 S.W. 919, 91 Tex. Crim. 348, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 191 (Tex. 1922).
238 S.W. 919 (McLaughlin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cox v. State
234 S.W. 531 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)