State v. Andrews

20 Tex. 230
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1857
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 20 Tex. 230 (State v. Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Andrews, 20 Tex. 230 (Tex. 1857).

Opinion

Wheeler, J.

The Act of the 30th of November, 1850, in its first Section, provided that “ all cases where land titles are involved, taken up from the District Courts to the Supreme Court, [231]*231when the State of Texas is a party, shall be returnable to the Supreme Court holding its sessions at the city of Austin.” (Laws of the 3d Legislature, Ch. 12, Sec. 1.) The Act of the 28th of August, 1856, amends the former Act by providing that its first Section “ shall hereafter read as follows,” &c., proceeding to re-enact some of its provisions, and among them that which makes causes determined in the county in which this cause was determined, returnable to the Court holding its session at Tyler; but omitting the provision above quoted in respect to land causes in which the State is a party. The latter Act must be deemed a complete repeal of the first Section of the former, including, of course, the provision in question, under which causes of this description were formerly returnable to this branch of the Court. The petition in error in this case was filed on the 11th, and the citation served on the 23d of December, 1856, made returnable, in terms, and brought to this Court, when by law it was made returnable to the Court at Tyler at its last Session. The bringing of the case to this Court was, therefore, not only plainly without the authority of law, but against law. It is therefore improperly upon the docket, and must be stricken therefrom; and it is ordered accordingly.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Opinion No.
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1977
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1977
Atlanta Metallic Casket Co. v. Mosby Truck Service, Inc.
131 S.E.2d 590 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Wiseman v. State
94 S.W.2d 265 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Texas Farm Bureau Cotton Ass'n v. Lennox
296 S.W. 325 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Lassiter v. Board of Commissioners
124 S.E. 738 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1924)
Cox v. State
234 S.W. 531 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)
Gayman, County Treasurer v. Mullen
1916 OK 863 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Flanders v. Multnomah County
73 P. 1042 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1903)
Miller v. State
69 S.W. 522 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1902)
Gilbert v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.
30 S.E. 673 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
People v. McNulty
29 P. 61 (California Supreme Court, 1892)
Etter v. Missouri Pac. R'y Co.
2 Wilson 48 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1883)
Basnett v. City of Jacksonville
19 Fla. 664 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1883)
Treadwell v. Board of Supervisors
62 Cal. 563 (California Supreme Court, 1881)
Blakemore v. Dolan
50 Ind. 194 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1875)
State v. Ingersoll
17 Wis. 631 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1864)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Tex. 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-andrews-tex-1857.