McCowan v. State

234 S.W. 887, 90 Tex. Crim. 264, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 104
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 16, 1921·No. No. 6372.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant was charged by indictment in various counts for violation of what has been termed the Dean Law. The fifth count, under which this conviction was had, charged him with possessing equipment for making intoxicating liquor. The Acts of the First and Second Called Session of the Thirty-seventh Legislature, page 233, so amended the Dean Law that the possession of equipment for the.manufacture of intoxicating liquor is not now an offense. State v. Cox, 90 Texas Crim. Rep., 256, Number 6423, decided at the present term of this court, and not yet reported.

It, therefore, follows that the conviction must be set aside, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCowan v. State, 234 S.W. 887, 90 Tex. Crim. 264, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 104 (Tex. 1921).

234 S.W. 887 (McCowan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jordan v. State
239 S.W. 946 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Cole v. State
239 S.W. 947 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)